Procedure Guide
Non-thermal
Histotripsy: focused ultrasound pulses to cause cavitation and non-thermal tissue destruction. Now FDA approved HistoSonics system. Very precise and evidence of at least some abscopal effect.
Chemical, e.g., ethanol: better for lesions with capsule like HCC, long track record, no heat sink BUT nonuniform distribution, worse results particularly with larger lesions than thermal ablation in multiple studies, ethanol toxicity
Irreversible electroporation (IPE): no heat sink, fast and uniform ablation BUT less data, limited availability, requires GA, increased bleeding risk (no cautery), issues w/ arrhythmias
Pulsed electric field (PEF) or “galvanized ablation”: similar to IPE, promising synergistic effect with immunotherapy and abscopal effect but can only treat 1 cm sphere per minute via 19G needle with filament inside.
Hyperthermic
RFA: long track record, numerous devices BUT requires grounding pads, can’t have pacemaker or ICD, heat sink issues, longer ablation times (can’t activate multiple probes at once)
Microwave: less heat sink, faster and hotter ablation, not restricted by high impedance structure (e.g. lung, bone, char) unlike RF BUT shorter track record, some devices have oblong ablation zones and shaft heating
Hypothermic
Cryoablation: less painful, more immunomodulation, better ablation zone visualization BUT cold sink issues, longer ablation times, higher bleeding risk (more have no cautery, more bleeding in the lungs, some evidence though that tract ablate doesn’t reduce bleeding risk), cryoshock (tends to occur in liver with large ablation zones, e.g, >35% liver volume)
Generally smaller isolated mass or few masses. More often recommended for poor surgical candidates or those with need to reserve organ tissue (i.e. poor reserve otherwise).
Kidney (RCC) - T1a (<4cm), T1b (<7cm) with high surgical risk, or oligometastatic with no invasion of surrounding structures or renal pelvis (2020 SIR Position Statement on RCC)
AUA 2021 guidelines focus primarily on T1a lesions in poor surgical candidates or CKD
Liver: HCC <3 cm (often for BCLC 0-B)
Lung: Stage IA who are poor surgical candidates, lung primary or metastases <3 cm, salvage therapy after chemoradiotherapy
Bone: Osteoid osteomas and painful bone metastases
Spine lesions: ideally intermediate Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS, 7-12)
Now in NCCN guidelines for palliation of spine metastases
Breast: Benign fibroadenomas up to 4.5 cm and breast cancer up to 1.5 cm in poor surgical candidates.
Other: painful soft tissue lesions for palliation or potential abscopal effect with galvanized ablation (ongoing research)
For primary treatment (e.g. HCC, RCC)
Life expectancy <1 year
Distant metastases
Larger tumors, some say >5 cm
Adjacent vital structure
Subdiaphragmatic or adjacent the hilum for the liver
Spine metastasis with extension through the posterior cortex AND neural deficits. Evidence suggests extension into the epidural space without neural involvement can be safely treated.
Adjacent large blood vessel for thermal ablation due to heat sink - 3-4 mm vessel for RFA, less important for microwave
Uncorrected coagulopathy (INR >1.7, Plts <50K)
Active infection (ablated tissue can serve as nidus for infection)
Pacemaker or ICD for RFA
Ablation generally +90% efficacy and similar to resection and SBRT for local control of small lesions <3 cm
Kidney
Active survaillence: favored if elderly, life expectancy <5yrs, <3cm, predominantly cystic
Partial nephrectomy usually better if >4 cm but lower complications and smaller GFR decrease with ablation
Cryoablation is most common but some are using microwave
Survival for ablation of T1a RCC: 97% (1yr), 91% (3yrs), 91% (5yrs)
Risk of recurrence: RFA 5.2% (0-12.2%), MWA 3.1% (0-17.1%), Cryo 6.7% (2.1-16.4%), Partial nephrectomy 1.6% (0-8.1%)
Similar recurrence rates (surgery vs ablation) if controlled for ablation patients being sicker (DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.08.013 and 10.1148/radiol.2018171407); however, there are reports of ~0% recurrence with robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy
Embolization + ablation > ablation alone if >5 cm
Liver
Surgical resection generally preferred if possible, survival benefit over ablation when >4 cm
Ablation may be the most cost-effective bridging strategy for HCC <3 cm vs TACE or TARE
Thermal ablation is generally preferred but ethanol ablation can be effective in 70-80% of HCC due to the capsule. Less effective (~50% complete necrosis) for metastases.
Early-stage HCC ablation survival: 96% (1yr), 72% (3yrs), 52% (5yrs)
TACE + ablation > TACE alone for HCC if 3-5 cm
CRC hepatic mets survival: 89% (1yr), 45% (3yrs), 25% (5yrs); superior to systemic therapy alone in CLOCC trial
Lung
Surgical resection is generally preferred if a candidate
Radiotherapy superior to ablation for larger primary tumors (>3 cm), but equivocal survival for smaller lesions and complications. ~60% of lesions after radiotherapy have viable tumor cells.
Stage 1A lung cancer ablation survival: 78% (1yr), 36% (3yrs), 27% (5yrs)
~80-90% local control for cryoablation and RFA, 90+% for microwave
Pulmonary mets 1 +/- 1.2 measuring 1.0 +/- 0.6 cm: 98% 1-yr OS, 5.3% complications (SOLSTICE trial)
Can be performed with co-existing ILD though acute exacerbations may occur in 8% with 60% mortality among those patients. Predictive factors for exacerbation include post-procedure fever or effusion.
Bone
Osteoid osteoma: 92% primary success, 99.6% secondary success
Bone mets: ~50% subjective pain decrease, pain score reduction of 4.10-5.25, 90% local tumor control
Ablation vs radiation: ablation is ideal for shorter life expectancy (works faster than radiation, ~1 wk vs 4-6 mo), in combination with radiotherapy (allows patient to tolerate lying on the table still better for radiotherapy), or radioresistant lesions (sarcoma, RCC, NSCLC, melanoma)
Ablation vs embolization: embolization is better if hypervascular, >5cm, or adjacent structures preventing safe ablation (nerves, hollow organs).
Ablation + cementoplasty is superior to ablation or cementoplasty alone in terms of pain relief and less cement leakage and adjacent fractures during follow up.
Average palliative bone met ablation outcomes: ~50% subjective pain decrease (more recent studies reporting >80-90%), pain score reduction of 4.10-5.25, 90% local tumor control. OPus One Trial - ablation for lytic bone mets was durable (sustained results at 12 mo) and effective (pain, disability, QoL)
Efficacy and complication rates vary and data is heterogeneous but RF and cryoablation may be safer than microwave ablation.
Breast
Highly successful (92-100%) in reported small studies in terms of local control. Complications are rare, usually just localized swelling, local pain, erythema.
Complete regression at 3 months superior with cryoablation compared to microwave ablation (96 vs 75%)
High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation: generally safe but no comparative trials
Laser ablation: limited data
Labs for bleeding risk and organ function, e.g., Cr for kidney
Consider spirometry for lung ablation if history of diffuse lung disease or surgery, ideally FEV1 should be >1L
Ensure proper staging often in collaboration with tumor board or oncologist
Review pre-procedure cross sectional imaging for planning/safe approach
RENAL Nephrometry score: Used for stratifying partial nephrectomy risk. Some suggest this can be used to estimate ablation risk. Others note that some metrics don’t apply and really only size, older age, more probes, and central tumor location matter in terms of complication risk
Pre-ablation biopsy recommended for renal lesions per 2020 SIR Position Statement and 2021 AUA guidelines as 40% masses <1 cm and 25% <3 cm end up being benign, help guide future management with genetic testing and targeted therapy
Some stop Avastin 2-4 weeks prior
Some give IV hydration if GFR 30-60 for renal ablation
Shave and place grounding pads and protective pads for areas with neurovascular bundles if using RFA
General anesthesia is generally preferred. Some use moderate sedation for cryoablation.
Pre-scan (CT, US, MRI), mark skin, local anesthesia
(Optional) Place needle or catheter is hydrodissection or pneumodissection is being used
(Optional) Placement of retrograde ureteral catheter for saline infusion with assistance of urology if using for collecting system protection
Select and place ablation probe(s)
Some suggest 2 probes of 1.5 cm diameter bracketing lesion up to 2 cm. Should target ablation zone 1 cm larger than lesion in all directions. CT may overestimate for lung, so targeting 1.2 cm may be better.
Tricks for lung lesions: (central) approach parallel to bronchovascular tree; (peripheral) tangential approach so ablation zone stays within visceral pleura
If lesion adjacent critical structure, can create PTX or use stick mode and move lesion away
If lesion adjacent vessel, approach parallel to vessel and heat safe side longer (e.g. 5 min) and vessel side shorter (e.g. 2 min) to finish off area adjacent the vessel
Wait 5 min to judge GGO ablation zone (CT over estimates slightly)
Use cryoablation for lesions near pleura (<3 cm)
Tricks for abdominal lesions: Hydrodissection w/ 1:30-50 dilute contrast in D5W. Don’t be stingy. Some have infusion running throughout the procedure. Can use pneumodissection, catheters, balloons. Target base of exophytic lesion tangential to kidney.
Central renal lesion: can have urology place ureteral catheter retrograde and irrigate collecting system with cool saline
Subdiaphragmatic lesion: higher local tumor progression, rare reported cases of diaphragmatic hernia with thermal ablation; hydrosection can help prevent
Ablate the lesion(s) with CT and/or US monitoring
Cryoablation: typically two 10-min cycles of argon freeze and 5-min nitrogen thaw (see chart are end of document)
RFA/Microwave: cell death within few minutes >50*C or few seconds >60*C, increase power to overcome heat sink with adjacent major vessel with MWA
Ethanol: volume required = 4/3 * 3.14 * (r + 0.5)^3; often 15 mL for 2 cm, 35 mL for 3 cm, and 65 mL for 4 cm; some people just default to 30 mL
Confirm target ablative margin via CE-CT and/or 3D modeling software if available/necessary
Margin of at least 5 mm, better if 10 mm. Nearly no local recurrence if 3D tracking software is used to confirm 3D 10 mm margins
NOTE for lung, ablative zone is dense core + lucent ring, NOT surrounding rim of hemorrhage
For palliative metastasis ablation, treatment of the entire lesion is not possible. For bone metastases, patients tend to get superior pain relief with treatment of the bone-tumor interface.
(Optional - bone mets) Some perform vertebral augmentation, cementoplaty, and percutaneous screw fixation after ablation to provide support and prevent pathologic fractures
RF ablation + augmentation is superior to ablation or augmentation alone for spine mets in few small studies in terms of pain relief and less cement leakage and adjacent fractures during follow up
Pull out probe gently, rotating to avoid shearing blood vessels. Can ablate track to reduce bleeding risk if using hyperthermic ablation.
If PTX, can aspirate and wait 10-15 min to see if it re-expands before placing chest tube
Death (0.1-0.5%): often secondary to complications such as sepsis, hepatic failure, colon perforation, PV thrombosis
Major adverse event (2-3%): internal bleeding, large pneumo/hemothorax, abscess, vital structure damage (e.g. bowel perforation), tumor seeding (very rare), skin burns, bile duct stenosis, urinoma/ureteral injury, cryoshock (thrombocytopenia + hepatic/renal failure)
Ureteral injury risk with renal ablation: 25% within 1 cm, 10% within 1-2 cm; reflux of excreted contrast into the treatment bed shouldn’t happen unless there’s ureteral obstruction.
Nerve injury with renal ablation: mainly the genitofemoral along the anterior psoas, lateral femoral cutaneous (numbness), iliohypogastric (oblique muscle atrophy, bulging flank syndrome), ilioinguinal; can hydrodissect to reduce risk
Nerve injury or pathologic fracture with palliative met ablation are very rare. Can use neuromodulation if high concern. None reported in OPus One study.
Minor adverse event (5-20%): small pneumothorax, transient hematuria, pain, fever, pleural effusion, minor bleeding, contrast reaction, transient hypotension
Bedrest for 1-2 hrs with ablation site down
Pain/nausea control, mIVF, can often discharge same day
Discharge instructions: avoid immersion in water 2-3d, resume normal activity in 7-10d
Good to discharge with NSAID to decreased inflammation
Follow up imaging with clinic visit
Often people do CT/MRI in 3-6 mo (thin peripheral enhancement is normal)
Normal for lesion to increase in size at 1-4 wks, be similar in size at 3 mo, and decrease in size by 6 mo if treated effectively
2021 AUA guidelines for RCC considered ablation intermediate risk suggesting follow up imaging every 6 mo for first 3 yrs then annual and continuing beyond 5 yrs
Decision Aids for Patients and Consent
Backtable Podcasts/Articles:
Multidisciplinary Position Statements: